The
period known as the Naqada phase lasted 800 years, from 4000 bc to 3200 bc
(Shaw, 2000). It is a period of consolidation through military conquest and
cultural assimilation. From 0 to the 2nd dynasties, we not only
saw the development of art and pottery in the Amratian phase but the aggressive
expansion and rise of kingship in the Gerzean phase culminating in the
Pre-dynastic phase when full unification of Upper and Lower Egypt had been
fully achieved (Josephson and Dreyer, 2015). Upper Egypt, or ta shemau in Egyptian, was rather
different from Lower Egypt, or ta mehu in
Egyptian, in both culture and art so it was only a matter of time before these
two cultures conflicted with each other. Feeding off of our previous entry therefore,
it becomes necessary to discuss Lower Egypt’s, having discussed Upper Egypt
earlier, art and culture, their burial customs and finally the assimilation into
Buto and transition into the Pre-dynastic phase.
The Merimda Head courtesy of Brown University |
The
Maadian complex or Maadi-Buto culture is located near the modern city of Cairo. It contains a dozen
sites or more which include a cemetery and the settlement itself. According to
Ian Shaw, the Maadian culture first appeared in the Naqada I phase but soon
disappeared in the Naqada II phase through cultural and military expansion
(Shaw, 2000). He continues to say the Maadi culture is a descendant of earlier
Neolithic sites such as the Faiyum region, Merimda, Beni-Salama, and El-Omari
(Shaw, 2000). The culture also differs completely from its Upper Egyptian
counterpart as well which is to say that the cemeteries were less prominent and
pottery not only was globular but lacked decoration too. The information
ascertained therefore comes from the settlements themselves rather than the
cemeteries (Shaw, 2000). University College London even says that the pottery
was made by hand and had a dark hue to it (UCL, 2000). Additionally, there is
however the absence of greywacke palettes that are so prevalent in Upper Egypt
as mentioned in the previous entry because of the use of limestone palettes
which hints at their luxurious nature of the greywacke.
Arrowhead made of stone from the Fayum region courtesy of the Met Museum |
There
is also evidence of Palestinian influence in the region, particularly in the
worked flint, Shaw reports (Shaw, 2000). Discoveries show edged blades known as
Canaanite blades, which later developed into razors, were used in funerary
rituals in the Old Kingdom. Additionally, catfish darts, dorsal fins and
polished ivory and bone have been found in and around the Maadian complex as
well (Shaw, 2000). Copper was also of great importance to the Maadian complex
too. Both Shaw and the UCL have documented the appearance and use of copper in
the form of needles, axes and rods. Whilst other cultures in the area such as
Merimda use stone to construct these tools, Maadi used copper ore which was
readily available in the nearby regions of Timna and Fenan on the Sinai
Peninsula.
Burial
sites, as well, in and around the Maadian complex are simple with oval pits
with the deceased placed in a foetal position accompanied by a mat and some
pottery vessels (Shaw, 2000). The University of College London
states as well that the hand was located in the front of the face (UCL, 2000). The
cemeteries here are also located some distance from the settlements. Comparing
Maadi with other Northern cultures, it is observed that other tombs are better
equipped without the luxury that is evinced in Upper Egyptian tombs. Shaw here
concludes that, although social stratification is discernible, there is a
possibility that the graves contain a mixture of dogs, gazelles and humans which adds to the social change (Shaw, 2000).
simple oval pit of the deceased with pottery courtesy of Mathilda's Anthropology |
As
the Maadian culture transitioned into the Pre-dynastic phase, Egyptologists
have discovered an increase in Naqada pottery whilst at the same time a
decrease in Maadian pottery which is evidence of the cultural assimilation
between the cultures of Lower and Upper Egypt (Shaw, 2000). This gives us the
impression that the Maadian culture did not abruptly end but rather was a slow
process. Another culture around this time was that of Buto which was located
nearby. It is in the opinion of the author and Ian Shaw that Buto is the culture
that usurped Maadi simply because it developed its own culture, myths,
ideology, beliefs and rites whilst at the same time was better suited for
trade. Its strategic importance and location allowed the region to supersede
that of Maadi which led to its decline
and demise. It seems that this change was inevitable for the next phase in
Egyptian history that was the Naqada III phase which is where full unification
was successfully achieved (Shaw, 2000).
A couple of copper ingots from Maadi-Buto culture courtesy of Mathilda Anthropology |
Drawing
heavily from Ian Shaw’s exhaustive book, what has emerged is another perspective
when it comes to Ancient Egypt. Lower Egypt, unlike its rival Upper Egypt, was
a descendant of the Faiyum region, Merimda, el-Omari and Beni Salama. Pottery
was hand-made and globular with a dark hue but really no geometric shapes or
animal forms which explains the lack of art in Lower Egypt. There is
Palestinian influence as well in the region with discoveries of edged blades
also known as Canaanite blades which were later used in funerary rites of the
Old Kingdom. Burial sites contain the deceased in foetal positions with their
hand in front of their face accompanied by pottery, mats and/or fabrics or
sometimes nothing at all. Finally, the transition or the disappearance of the
Maadian complex took a long time rather than abruptly ending but was a slow
process achieved through cultural assimilation into the Buto culture. Buto’s
strategic and location allowed for Buto to supersede the Maadian culture which
seemed necessary and inevitable for the next phase in Egyptian history to take
effect, the Naqada III phase.
References
Josephson
A. Jackson, Dreyer, Günter. 2015. Naqada IId: The Birth of an Empire. Journal
of American Research Center in Egypt. Volume 51. 165-178.
Shaw,
Ian. 2000. The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press.
“Maadi-
Topic Overview.” University College London. 2000. n.p.
No comments:
Post a Comment